"450X_FTW" (mistermic)
06/08/2016 at 13:46 • Filed to: None
31
19|
"450X_FTW" (mistermic)
06/08/2016 at 13:46 • Filed to: None | 31
| 19 |
CB
> 450X_FTW
06/08/2016 at 13:49 |
|
All that work and they missed the “October 19, 2015" date, as well as putting 1965 instead of 1964 1/2 for the model year.
TheHondaBro
> CB
06/08/2016 at 13:54 |
|
I haven’t enunciated half-years since I was 6-1/2.
jariten1781
> 450X_FTW
06/08/2016 at 13:56 |
|
Are Mustang IIs included or is that considered a separate model?
The Dummy Gummy
> 450X_FTW
06/08/2016 at 13:56 |
|
This is pretty elaborate. Well done.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ michael - berardi -a0076812
MontegoMan562 is a Capri RS Owner
> TheHondaBro
06/08/2016 at 13:58 |
|
Well to be fair the Mustang wasn’t even 6 in 1964 1/2
|
MontegoMan562 is a Capri RS Owner
> CB
06/08/2016 at 13:58 |
|
It’s all in the details lol
PotbellyJoe and 42 others
> CB
06/08/2016 at 13:58 |
|
Exactly my thought.
|
TheHondaBro
> MontegoMan562 is a Capri RS Owner
06/08/2016 at 13:59 |
|
It was born at a very young age.
|
450X_FTW
> jariten1781
06/08/2016 at 14:03 |
|
I would assume separate model, since I think if they tried to run over a crowd of people the engine would just stall out and the crowd would have a slight scuff on their jeans as a result.
|
450X_FTW
> The Dummy Gummy
06/08/2016 at 14:03 |
|
Not mine, can’t take credit for this. Definitely do not have that much free time ha
Future next gen S2000 owner
> CB
06/08/2016 at 14:04 |
|
There are no 1964 1/2 year cars.
|
CB
> Future next gen S2000 owner
06/08/2016 at 14:06 |
|
Okay, VINs say 1965, so I guess you’re right there. My mistake. But I guess they’d still be 1964 1/2 cars?
|
TheHondaBro
> 450X_FTW
06/08/2016 at 14:08 |
|
But what if they were wearing their favorite Kirkland jeans?
|
jariten1781
> 450X_FTW
06/08/2016 at 14:09 |
|
Is there going to be a big scandal when Hard Copy discovers that there was an internal Ford memo discussing the removal of the anti-crowd-ramming safety stall feature on the transition to the Fox? The executives knew!
|
450X_FTW
> TheHondaBro
06/08/2016 at 14:14 |
|
I think Kirkland warranties against this
|
Future next gen S2000 owner
> CB
06/08/2016 at 14:15 |
|
This is actually a huge pet peeve of my. The title and VIN all say 1965. It stems from an effort to delineate early model year builds that had a generator vs an alternator. 1964 1/2 had the generator, 1965 had the alternator.
So short answer is no. They are all 1965 model year cars. Mustang enthusiasts had a whose dick is bigger competition and created the 1964 1/2 tag that is so common.
/rant
I want to slap everyone person whose says they have a 1964 1/2 Mustang. No, no you don’t and you are liar and a dirty, dirty stupid person.
/endrant
|
CB
> Future next gen S2000 owner
06/08/2016 at 14:16 |
|
Ah, gotcha. Thanks for the clarification.
Urambo Tauro
> Future next gen S2000 owner
06/08/2016 at 14:40 |
|
I take it a little further, disliking model years that don’t match the build date. It’s hopelessly permeated throughout the industry now.
Daily Drives a Dragon - One Last Lap
> 450X_FTW
06/08/2016 at 14:41 |
|
That is very well done.